Lived Experience of Undergraduate University Students
Increasing Dependency on AI-based Digital Tools for Academic Work
Keywords:
Lived Experience, Undergraduate, Increasing Dependency, AI-baseAcademic WorkAbstract
The accelerated fusion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) based digital tools into higher education has outstandingly transformed the academic entity of undergraduate university students. Expending academic demands, performance expectations, and pressing deadlines have led many undergraduate university students to turn heavily on AI tools for academic writing, problem-solving, academic support, and time management. This Qualitative study aims to explore the lived experiences of undergraduate university students with respect to their increasing dependency on AI-based digital tools. A qualitative phenomenological research design was employed to obtain a profound understanding of students’ perceptions, feelings, and meanings regarding their use of AI tools throughout their academic progression. Data were obtained through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with undergraduate university students chosen using purposive sampling. The interviews provided copious and in-depth narratives of students’ perceptions and personal experiences. The interview was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim to ensure accuracy. Data were studied using thematic analysis, aimed at documenting frequent outlines and distinguished themes within the data. The investigation revealed six leading themes, frequent key themes, counting Significant Necessity on AI for Theoretical Everyday jobs, Although Capability and Academic Expediency, AI as Intellectual and Academic Provision, Reducing Education, Preservation, and Critical Intelligent skills, Ethical, Economic, and procedural regarding Encounters, and Heedful Efforts to Equilibrium AI-based tools practice and Self-determining Knowledge. The conclusions of this study emphasized that AI-based digital tools play a transformative role in shaping undergraduate theoretical practices. Unfluctuating nevertheless these paraphernalia foster productivity, association, and theoretical excellence, overwhelming dependance attitudes extensive hazards to scholarship complexity, recollection preservation, and intellectual progress. Campuses and educationalists would henceforth progress accountable and well-adjusted AI combination comprehensive clear approaches, ethical management, and assessment methods that ensure admiration for self-determining acquaintance and academic honesty.
References
Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2).
Baskara, R. (2023). Exploring the implications of ChatGPT for language learning in higher education. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 343-358.
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 20(1), 43.
Holland, A., & Ciachir, C. (2025). A qualitative study of students’ lived experience and perceptions of using ChatGPT: Immediacy, equity, and integrity. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 483-494.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Jia, W., Pan, L., & Neary, S. (2025). Effect of GenAI Dependency on University Students’ Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy and Moderating Role of Perceived Teacher Caring. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1348.
Karata?, F., Abedi, F. Y., Ozek Gunyel, F., Karadeniz, D., & Kuzgun, Y. (2024). Incorporating AI in foreign language education: An investigation into ChatGPT’s effect on foreign language learners. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19343-19366.
Livberber, T., & Ayvaz, S. (2023). The impact of Artificial Intelligence in academia: Views of Turkish academics on ChatGPT. Heliyon, 9(9).
Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education.
Lund, B. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries. Library Hi Tech News.
Muzumdar, P., & Cheemalapati, S. (2025). Exploring Student Interactions with AI-Powered Learning Tools: A Qualitative Study Connecting Interaction Patterns to Educational Learning Theories. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00519.
Nugroho, F. (2025). Emotional Ambivalence and Perceived Empathy in Students’ Experiences Using AI-Based Academic Assistants: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 1(5), 212-219.
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development.
Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, 12(1), 22.
Rukiati, E., Wicaksono, J. A., Taufan, G. T., & Suharsono, D. D. (2023). AI on learning English: Application, benefit, and threat. Journal of Language, Communication, and Tourism, 1(2), 32-40.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers?: AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15.
Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students’ academic development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International journal of educational technology in higher education, 16(1), 1-27.
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28.
Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., & Kim, J. H. (2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 21(1), 34.
Zhu, Q., & Luo, J. (2024). Toward artificial empathy for human-centered design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 146(6), 061401.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of History and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

