Concept of Authority in Muslim Political Thought of Medieval India
A Comparative Study of Zia-ud-Din Barani and Abul Fazal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16580405Keywords:
Keywords: Political Authority, Zia-ud-Din Barani, Abul Fazal, Delhi Sultanate, Mughal Empire, Muslim Political ThoughtAbstract
Muslim political thought in India during the medieval period presents a rich source of ideas and principles that shaped governance in India. The Delhi Sultanate, established in the early 13th century, was the first of the major Muslim states in India that set foundational models in administration, law, and intercultural and inter-religious relations. The Mughal Empire, which succeeded the Delhi Sultanate in the 16th century, was marked by a more advanced and sophisticated administration, depicting strong Persian influences and also having an impact on Islamic political ideals. The main elements of Muslim political thought during this era included the concept of a divine right to rule. Whether the rulers expressed themselves as caliphs or not or whether they allied themselves with the Muslim Caliphate at that time is an interesting matter to be looked at. The principles adopted by both the Sultans and Mughals to justify their rule in India with multiple religions and multiple ethnicities within Muslims all struggling for influence and power in the court and the king’s attempt to establish his authority makes this a valuable study having something to learn for the current political order and governance. The article adopts a comparative approach and takes Zia-ud-Din Barani from the Sultanate period and Abul Fazal from the Mughal Empire and attempts to explore their ideas about political authority. It looks into the questions of how and why political authority has been justified by these two political thinkers and what role they assign to the masses and common people in the establishment of that authority.
References
A. Azfar Moin, The Millennial Sovereign: Sacred Kingship and Sainthood in Islam (Columbia University Press, 2012), 178, https://doi.org/10.7312/moin16036.
Abul Fazl Usmani, “Political Ideas of Shaikh Abul Fazl Allami (1556—1602),” The Indian Journal of Political Science 24, no. 3 (1963): 264.
Ahmad, “Political Philosophy of Zia-Ud-Din Barani,” 57–58.
Ahmad, “Political Philosophy of Zia-Ud-Din Barani.” 37.
Ahmad, “Political Philosophy of Zia-Ud-Din Barani.” 45.
Antony Black, The History of Islamic Political Thought: From the Prophet to the Present, 1st edition (New York: Routledge, 2001), 166–67.
Beveridge, The Akbarnama Of Abul Fazl Vol. 1, 16.
Blochmann, Ain-i-Akbari Vol. 1, 109–40.
Faruqui, The Princes of the Mughal Empire, 1504–1719, 145.
H. Beveridge, The Akbarnama Of Abul Fazl Vol. 1, 1907, 36–37, http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.55648.
H. Blochmann, Ain-i-Akbari Vol. 4, 1873, http://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.32526. ii.
Habib and Khan, The Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate, 169–71.
Habib and Khan, The Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate, 21–26.
Habib and Khan, The Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate, 30–32.
Habib and Khan, The Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate, 53–53.
Habib and Khan, The Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate, 58–60.
Habib and Khan, The Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate, 8–10.
Hardy, “Unity and Variety in Indo-Islamic and Perso-Islamic Civilization,” 132.
Irfan Habib, “A Political Theory For The Mughal Empire — A Study Of The Ideas Of Abu’l Fazl,” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 59 (1998): 21–22.
Irfan Habib, “Barani’s Theory of the History of Delhi Sultanate,” ICHR, New Delhi 7, no. 1–2 (1981 1980): 100, http://archive.org/details/IrfanHabibBaranisTheoryDelhiSultanate.
Ishtiaq Husain Qureshi, The Administration of the Sultanate of Delhi (Oriental Books Reprint Corporation; exclusively distributed by Munshiram Manoharlal, 1971). 42-43.
Jos Gommans and Said Reza Huseini, “Neoplatonism and the Pax Mongolica in the Making of Ṣulḥ-i Kull. A View from Akbar’s Millennial History,” Modern Asian Studies 56, no. 3 (May 2022): 870–901, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X21000044.
M. Athar Ali, “The Evolution of the Perception of India: Akbar and Abu’l Fazl,” Social Scientist 24, no. 1/3 (1996): 84–85, https://doi.org/10.2307/3520120.
M. Athar Ali, “Theories of Sovereignty in Islamic Thought in India,” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 43 (1982): 815–16.
Mohammad Habib and Afsar Umar Salim Khan, The Political Theory of the Delhi Sultanate: (Including a Translation of Ziauddin Barani’s Fatawa-i Jahandari, Circa, 1358-9 A.D.) (Kitab Mahal, 1961), 19.
Moin, The Millennial Sovereign, 153.
Munis D. Faruqui, The Princes of the Mughal Empire, 1504–1719 (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 142.
Najaf Haider, “Money and Social Inequality: The Views of Abul Fazl,” Studies in People’s History 3 (May 5, 2016): 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/2348448916636694.
P. Hardy, “The ‘Oratio Recta’ of Baranī’s ‘Ta’rīkh-i-Fīrūz Shāhī’--Fact or Fiction?” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 20, no. 1/3 (1957): 319.
P. Hardy, “Unity and Variety in Indo-Islamic and Perso-Islamic Civilization: Some Ethical and Political Ideas of Ḍiyā’ al-Dīn Baranī of Delhi, of al-Ghazālī and of Naṣīr al-Dīn Tūsī Compared,” Iran 16 (1978): 129–30, https://doi.org/10.2307/4299652.
Padmesh Pathak, “Ziyauddin Barani’s Theory of Price Control—a Critical Estimate,” Proceedings of the Indian History Congress 45 (1984): 297–98.
R. P. Tripathi, Some Aspects of Muslim Administration (Central Book Depot, 1966), 118.
Raziuddin Aquil, The Muslim Question: Understanding Islam and Indian History (Random House Publishers India Pvt. Limited, 2017), 66.
Riaz Ahmad, “Political Philosophy of Zia-Ud-Din Barani,” Pakistan Journal of History & Culture Vol.25/1 (2004): 35–36.
Rizvi, Religious and Intellectual History of the Muslims in Akbar’s Reign, with Special Reference to Abuʼl Fazl, 1556-1605, 352.
Rizvi, Religious and Intellectual History of the Muslims in Akbar’s Reign, with Special Reference to Abuʼl Fazl, 1556-1605, 354.
Rizvi, Religious and Intellectual History of the Muslims in Akbar’s Reign, with Special Reference to Abuʼl Fazl, 1556-1605, 357.
Rizvi, Religious and Intellectual History of the Muslims in Akbar’s Reign, with Special Reference to Abuʼl Fazl, 1556-1605, 356.
Rizvi, Religious and Intellectual History of the Muslims in Akbar’s Reign, with Special Reference to Abuʼl Fazl, 1556-1605, 356.
Rizvi, Religious and Intellectual History of the Muslims in Akbar’s Reign, with Special Reference to Abuʼl Fazl, 1556-1605, 360.
S. M. Jaffar, The Mughal Empire, from Bābar to Aurangzeb (Ess Publications, 1936), 163.
S. R. Sharma, “Abul Fazl as a Political Thinker,” The Indian Journal of Political Science 9, no. 1 (1948): 44.
Saiyid Athar Abbas Rizvi, Religious and Intellectual History of the Muslims in Akbar’s Reign, with Special Reference to Abuʼl Fazl, 1556-1605 (Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers, 1975), 342.
Sheikh Mohamad Ikram, History of Muslim Civilization in India and Pakistan: A Political and Cultural History (Institute of Islamic Culture, 1989), 161.
Syed Hasan Askari, Ameer Khusrau As A Historian (Patna: Khuda Bakhsh Oriental Public Library, 1988), 19–22, https://www.rekhta.org/ebooks/detail/ameer-khusrau-as-a-historian-syed-hasan-askari-ebooks.
Syros, “Indian Emergencies,” 555.
Tripathi, Some Aspects of Muslim Administration, 138–39.
Usmani, “Political Ideas of Shaikh Abul Fazl Allami (1556—1602),” 267.
Usmani, “Political Ideas of Shaikh Abul Fazl Allami (1556—1602),” 274.
Usmani, “Political Ideas of Shaikh Abul Fazl Allami (1556—1602),” 277–78.
Usmani, “Political Ideas of Shaikh Abul Fazl Allami (1556—1602),” 275.
Usmani, “Political Ideas of Shaikh Abul Fazl Allami (1556—1602),” 276–77.
Usmani, “Political Ideas of Shaikh Abul Fazl Allami (1556—1602),” 278.
Vasileios Syros, “Indian Emergencies: Baranī’s Fatāwā-I Jahāndārī, the Diseases of the Body Politic, and Machiavelli’s ‘Accidenti,’” Philosophy East and West 62, no. 4 (2012): 548–49.
Vasileios Syros. "State Failure and Successful Leadership in Medieval India." Studies in History, 37 (2021): 7 - 25. https://doi.org/10.1177/02576430211001961.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
